Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Game of Thrones. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Game of Thrones. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, 8 de junio de 2015

Killing characters: Why some horrible deaths are okay and some are not

0 comentarios
 
I don’t know why you’d be reading this if you haven’t watched the last episode of Game of Thrones, but just in case you haven’t and don’t want to be spoiled, please, stop reading. Game of Thrones seems to be the only thing I want to talk about lately, so I might as well take advantage and write about it, hopefully get some interesting discussion on the subject.

A few weeks ago, I ranted at Shonda Rhimes because of McDreamy’s death (STILL NOT OVER THAT). If anything, last night’s Game of Thrones episode nine we all knew it was coming and yet we still hate it death was much more horrifying, not only in the execution, but also in regards to the storyline. A man dying while trying to help others is heroic, even if McDreamy’s death was stupid and unnecessary. A child being burned alive by her father because a priestess insists she needs royal blood to make sure they win the battle to come is just…stupid.

But it works.

It works, because, in this world that Game of Thrones has built for us, these things happen. No one is perfectly good or perfectly evil, and characters we respected, like Stannis, can do incomprehensible things. It works, in a way it didn’t in Grey’s Anatomy, because the Derek Shepherd that we knew and loved wouldn’t have gone back for his stupid cell-phone only to get run over in the middle of an otherwise deserted street.

The unthinkable sometimes make more sense than the seemingly ordinary. Especially when it’s well written.

Of course, there’s also the fact that I could see Shireen’s death coming a mile away. I tried to ignore my instincts, because some things are too horrible to consider, but the foreshadowing was there. In fact, the foreshadowing was so strong that, after the episode, I was left to think that, as angry as we all felt that she was dead, we would have felt cheated if she’d survived.

We don’t have to like all stories. We don’t have to agree with what the writers give us. But, if the writing is good, more often than not, we’ll at least have to bow our head and say: Fine, I can accept that. It makes sense.

That’s the difference between a horrible death and an awful one. The writers. Good writing can tell almost any story. You hear that, Shonda? Almost any story. 

martes, 19 de mayo de 2015

Game of Thrones, Sansa Stark and the book vs TV show experience

0 comentarios
 
I read all five books in the Song of Ice and Fire series, and yes, I am guilty of offering deals to the devil in exchange for Book 6. I am a fan. I haven’t been one for as long as other people, but I am a fan. A dedicated one. I’ve discussed theories much more complicated than R+L=J and have spent countless hours trying to figure out what the future holds for my favorite characters.

Surprisingly enough, that doesn’t mean I don’t enjoy the TV show.

I say surprising, because if there is one thing I can admit about myself, it’s that I AM a snob. I have had a problem with almost every literary adaptation of a book I have loved, and the few exceptions to the rule (Lord of the Rings comes to mind) are usually reserved for the books I didn’t love so much. If I love the book, I must certainly won’t love the movie/show. Especially if they change things.

Enter Game of Thrones.

I’ve got no explanation for you. I really don’t. The TV show has done some things that have made me throw the appropriate book at the screen. (The Jamie/Cersei “rape” ….UGH), but, in general, they’ve done right by the characters I like, and have actually made me enjoy characters I despised or were bored by.

DANERYS, I’M LOOKING AT YOU.

That is, until the whole Sansa thing.

I couldn’t even watch. It wasn’t a shocking development. We all figured it was coming. But I swear, in a TV show where violence and nudity are a common thing, this time, I couldn’t even watch. I was horrified. Disgusted.

AND I DON’T EVEN LIKE SANSA.

Violence for the sake of violence is not my cup of tea. Violence against females for the sake of making them stronger is abhorrent.

And yet…I can’t stop watching. I won’t stop watching.

You have every right to do so, if you want. I won’t begrudge you your right. (I repeat, it WAS awful). But…as much as we may pretend to understand the reasons …we have only read the books. The TV show is clearly a different beast. And  no, they don’t always make the right choices. But, this is another one of my flaws, one I recognize, and have discussed a length.

I’m a writer, you see. I like to give other writers the benefit of the doubt. I like to think that there’s a reason for whatever is going on. I usually finish every book I read, even if I want to rip the pages out, because…well, because I never feel like I can properly criticize if I don’t have the full story.

So, yes, I will watch. Maybe they’ll convince me this wasn’t just raping a woman for the shock value. Maybe it wasn’t more violence in an already violent show just because violence sells. Maybe there’s a reason that serves the story.

I hope so. And it’s okay if you’re not a masochist as I am. What happened to Sansa wasn’t pretty. It wasn’t fun. IT WASN’T EVEN IN THE BOOK.

But, hey, it could still make for a damn good story. 

martes, 3 de junio de 2014

We all knew what was coming on #GOT ...and yet it still killed us.

0 comentarios
 
We should be used to this by now. Aren’t we used to this by now? Some of us should even be prepared (We’ve read the books, after all). If GRR Martin has done anything for our general consciousness as readers, it’s been make us tick-skinned. Strong. Nothing should surprise us. Nothing should crush us. And, of course, nothing, ABSOFREAKINGLUTELY NOTHING should make us go:

But, of course, we haven’t learned. We never learned. We fell in love with Ned Stark first. Oh, Ned. How we loved you. You were the hero of the story. The good guy among the snakes. And, well, this was fantasy. We knew the rules of fantasy. Things were going to get crappy, but …rules were rules …the good guys always win.

Then this happened.


And, we screamed, we cried, we were shocked, amazed, MAD, but …after a while, we got it. This was not the story we thought we were reading/watching. This was a story of rising from the ashes. This was a story of a family who overcomes. This was Rob’s story, not Ned’s.

Yeah, we all know how THAT turned out.

HBO / shammathegreat.com

But, at this point, we thought we were immune. After Ned, after Jory, and Septa Mordane, Lady and all the Baratheons (well, most of them), after Maester Luwin, and, of course, after the Red Wedding, we were immune. We didn’t love the characters with so much passion. We liked the show/books, yes, but we did so in a detached way.

Then came Oberyn Martell.

At first, he was merely funny. He wanted dead Lannisters, we wanted dead Lannisters, so we had  things in common. And Ellaria Sand was pretty and he clearly loved her. Enough to always included her in his orgies, at least. And, well, he wasn’t a hero, but he was charming, and a bit nasty, and, in the end, he was going to save Tyrion, of course he was, and he was going to get his revenge, he was Inigo Montoya and the Mountain better PREPARE TO DIE and …and …

Yes …and.



So, thank you, GRR Martin. Thank you for crushing our collective souls once again. I wish I could say we’ve learned our lesson.


Until next time. 

lunes, 24 de junio de 2013

Jaime Lannister, or how to love a bad guy.

2 comentarios
 

Let me start by saying there are SPOILERS all over this post, because, frankly, you cannot really talk about Jaime Lannister’s transformation without spoiling the books a little bit. The series just hasn’t given us enough yet. It starts with the hand, yes, but it’s so much more than that. There’s just so much more to Jamie, stuff we only get to really see when we finally get a POV from him, from Book 3 onwards. Stuff that made him go from one of the most hated characters in the books to a definite fan favorite, as we wait for Book 6. So, bear with me as I try to explain why Jaime Lannister is the perfect example of redemption done right in literature. 

I have many issues with George R.R Martin, and I’m still convinced that we won’t get anything that resembles a happy ending at the end of this saga. He’s got, in my humble opinion, too many characters and a plot that’s so encompassing it’s hard to keep track of. But the guy also has his strengths, and, despite the fact that the “redemption” trope has been done to death, I think that the character of Jaime Lannister is one of them.

He’s nothing but a token bad guy when we first meet him. His family, after all, comprises many of the stories “bad guys.” Tyrion has, at least, the advantage of being amusing. Jaime is just there. He’s not as smart as his father, not as manipulative as his sister, and not nearly as entertaining as his brother. He’s just another bad guy.

Well, at least until Bran catches him with Cersei. 

He becomes more than a token bad guy then, more than the Kingslayer, more than the guy sleeping with his sister, more than the ever-confident knight with the snide remarks. He dispenses with the theory that this book will be just another fantasy novel, and he becomes someone you hate.

Which is why Jaime Lannister ends up being such a surprise. 

It starts out slowly. In every interaction with Brienne. In his obvious respect for her. In the way that he lies to make sure she is not harmed. Later, after his hand is lost, it gets harder to conjure up the hate. A part of you wants him to just die, but Brienne doesn’t want that, and you end up agreeing with her. You root for him. You want him to get to King’s Landing, help free Sansa. He’s still not a hero, but he’s not at the top of your villains list, not anymore.

And then, he jumps into a bear-pit. And you can’t help but look at him the same way Brienne is looking at him. With wonder. With a twinge of affection. Because this man, who you’ve been hating for so long, has turned out to be nothing like what you thought he was. He’s turned out to be much more honorable.

And, yes, he’s still got issues. He still makes the wrong choices. But, in a way, that makes you like him more. Because now he realizes it. Now he wants to change. And, by the time Book 5 rolls around and Brienne is back, standing there, in front of him, you’re rooting for him. For the guy he’s become. The one who turned his back on Cersei. The one who tried, as best as he could, to keep his oaths.  

Some people see the relationship between Jaime and Brienne as a romantic one. Maybe it is. Maybe it isn’t. In the end, what no one can deny is that, sometimes, the right person can change you. And, though, that, is a tried and true concept in fantasy, the way George R.R Martin gives us Jaime Lannister, the Kingslayer and what he ends up becoming (and what he still has a chance to become), feels right. Feels new. It feels like, maybe, Jaime was right when he said: “There are no men like me. There’s only me.”

miércoles, 5 de junio de 2013

Game of thrones: the good, the bad, and the downright ugly.

2 comentarios
 

GOOD
BAD
An interesting and expansive world
You don’t need almost 2 MILLION FREAKING words (and counting) to create a new world. And, even if you feel like you have to write all of them, leave only the essential for the story and make the rest of it an appendix, or something. You’ll make more money that way. Ask Tolkien.
Dragons!
Who take forever to grow the hell up.
Compelling and relatable characters.
The fact that there are so MANY of them you can’t even remember all of their names and Houses, much less pick a favorite.
Jaime Lannister
Jaime Lannister
The sense that bad things can happen to good characters. (In other words, there’s no way for you to guess what’s coming)
The sense that ONLY bad things happen to good characters. (In other words, some happiness would be nice, kthanx)
Moral complexity. Not everything is black and white. People can change.
Some payoff for all this moral complexity would be good. You know, one of those characters that does a good thing, for a change, actually ACHIEVING SOMETHING.
Great villains.
Despicable characters. Honestly. Either they’re rotten to the core or they’re all too noble, in a way that makes them seem idiots. Is it too much to ask for a character, you know, in the middle?
There’s never a dull moment.
But, is anything actually happening? Some characters seem to be going in circles, never getting anywhere (For example, Bran. And Arya)
Willingness to break old story-telling tropes.
KILLING EVERY DAMN CHARACTER TO DO IT.

And the downright ugly: The fact that you (Yes, I’m looking at YOU George R.R Martin) make me fall in love with characters and then SLAUGHTER THEM like it’s nothing, like they were just a new toy you got and now you’re sick of, and then I get over it, suck it up, keep reading, and then you DO IT AGAIN, AND AGAIN, AND AGAIN.

::deep breaths::

lunes, 30 de abril de 2012

10 cosas que aprendí leyendo Game of Thrones…

0 comentarios
 

Me he pasado la mayor parte de los últimos días llevando el segundo libro  de George R.R. Martin, “A Clash of Kings” a absolutamente todos lados. Ahora mismo me encuentro atrapada en ese momento donde quieres terminar el libro, obvio, porque quieres saber que pasa, pero parte de ti no quiere terminarlo. Parte de ti no quiere que se acabe.

Mientras me decido, he querido compartir con ustedes las 10 lecciones más importantes de esta saga (y eso que solo llevo dos libros, de aquí a que termine quizás tenga 50) 

1. Nadie es indispensable. Si está bien escrito, si la historia es interesante, y si hay suficientes personajes para llenar el vacío, nadie es indispensable. O, dicho de una manera más cruel…cualquiera puede morir.

2. La manera de mantener la atención del lector es complicar las cosas. Y luego complicarlas más. Y más. Y más. Los personajes necesitan más de un problema.  

3. Cuando uno va a complicar las cosas, necesita saber, de antemano, como las va a arreglar. De lo contrario todo se vuelve confuso. Si uno está confundido, el lector lo estará. 

4. Si la historia de un personaje tiene más complicaciones/emoción que la de otro personaje, este pasará a ser el favorito de tus lectores automáticamente. En otras palabras, si quieres mantener a todos tus personajes en igualdad de condiciones, todos tiene que tener problemas.

5. La mejor ciencia-ficción es la que no se explica. Esta regla aplica para todos los géneros. Es mejor explicar lo básico e ir dejando caer información de a poquito. Un libro, al final del camino, debe estimular la imaginación. Deja que el lector llene los espacios.

6. No ignores a los malos. Alguien siempre tiene que ser el malo de la película, obviamente. Las historias donde todos son buenos son tremendamente aburridas. La clave de tu libro está en esos personajes. No los ignores. Dedícales el mismo tiempo que a tus héroes. 

7. Nadie es del todo malo, o bueno. Pero no olvides tampoco que todos los personajes, así como los seres humanos, son capaces de cosas malas, y de cosas buenas. El malo puede querer a alguien. El bueno puede actuar motivado por la venganza. Eso los hace más interesantes.

8. Intenta evitar los clichés, pero no los evites todos. Evitarlos por completo es imposible, y, además, en algunos casos, es imposible evitarlos completamente. Pero, si tienes que utilizar alguno, intenta darle tu propio twist. 

9. Nunca resuelvas los problemas en un capitulo. Si lo haces, ¿para que seguir leyendo? Resuélvelos a la mitad de un capitulo, y luego, crea otra razón para que el lector siga interesado. No le des a tus lectores una excusa para parar.

10. No te obsesiones con reglas ajenas. Lee. Sal a la calle. Vive tu vida. Y así, poco a poco, iras descubriendo tus propias reglas. Y no me refiero solo a reglas para escribir…
 
© 2012. Design by Main-Blogger - Blogger Template and Blogging Stuff